Can AI assistants read helsinginuutiset.fi?

Measured on 2026-09-19 by asking the site 7 times — once as a browser, once as each of the 6 crawlers that feed ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Meta AI, Apple Intelligence and Doubao — and comparing what came back. The AI-training opt-out tokens that never crawl are read from robots.txt instead.

What each crawler got back

AWS CloudFront answers for this domain. Where a crawler above is refused while robots.txt allows it, the rule is applied by that edge, not written by the site — see how often each edge does this.

What to change, in order

1. Declare the facts in JSON-LD
   There is no JSON-LD on the page, so every fact — who you are, what you sell, the price — has to be guessed out of the prose and the layout. A schema.org block is the difference between being quoted correctly and being paraphrased.
2. Publish llms.txt
   llms.txt is missing, so an assistant has to discover the site by following links. llms.txt is the emerging convention for telling an assistant which pages actually matter.
3. 6 crawlers are named and refused in robots.txt — a deliberate choice
   ClaudeBot, GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot, Meta-ExternalAgent, Amazonbot are blocked by a rule that names them. Nothing to fix here: this page records what is true, not what should be. It is listed so the deliberate part of the block is not confused with the accidental part above.

The checks

• Answers AI agents like it answers people100%
• Readable without JavaScript100%
• robots.txt lets the crawlers in0%
• Facts in JSON-LD0%
• Content reachable, not buried61%
• Publishes a map of itself70%
• Plain structure78%

Sites with a similar score

Browse the whole index →

Embed this score

Put the badge on helsinginuutiset.fi — it links back here, and re-measures every time this index re-crawls.

<a href="https://shop.lumnika.com/ai-readiness/helsinginuutiset.fi"><img src="https://shop.lumnika.com/ai-readiness/helsinginuutiset.fi/badge.svg" alt="AI readability"></a>